HEMINGWAY'S UNDERPANTS

If Women Played in the NBA

There is no rule that says NBA players have to be men, yet there are no women on the court. Since most of our institutions are designed to please women, there may come a time when teams will be required to play at least one woman, but more likely, teams would be required to make half of their teams female.

If this happens, we may begin to see the following:

Woman: His hand brushed against my breasts!

LeBron: I was just trying to get the ball!

Ref: Your intentions don’t matter! [blows whistle]

By the way, these are not jokes….this could actually happen.

Some other future quotes from the female players:

“The coach said I needed to lose some weight, I have filed a lawsuit because I am being body-shamed!”

“These men are too rough! I keep getting hurt!” (prompting new rule that players cannot touch each other)

”You called travelling on me for taking three steps but I should be allowed to take three steps because they are taller than me and I cannot go as far with two steps.”

“The 3-point line is too far from the basket, the men have an advantage because it’s easier for them to shoot that far, so that line needs to be moved closer to the basket.”

“You called that foul because I am a woman!”

“I should be able to shower with my teammates…hey, they are looking at my body and they have erections! This is a hostile work environment!”

It is coming…you just wait.

Question: Why are there Pop Tarts but no Mom Tarts?

Answer: It’s because of the Pastryarchy!

And here’s an older one I used to enjoy…

Question: How many feminists does it take to screw in a light bulb?

Answer: That’s NOT funny.

Okay okay, settle down, ladies, and beta males under their control.

Dammit, I just alienated a bunch more people…come now, only a true beta male would be offended enough to stop reading after that, so keep reading, fellas — unless you’re a beta male!

See what I did there?

Full stop…on to the subject, wherein we will see if I can convince you that we live in a matriarchy that pretends it is a patriarchy so that we can continue deepening the matriarchy.

For many decades since the feminist revolution in the 70s, in America, it was simply stated by TV pundits and celebrities as fact that we live in a patriarchy. Indeed the entire world was, and is, it is still said, a patriarchy. I don’t claim to know the ins and outs of what EXACTLY would constitute a patriarchy, but certainly things like the fact that it was common throughout the world that women could not own or inherit property surely seemed to advantage men in an obvious way — but what about the times we live in now in America and the west? Things have changed decidedly and nothing in the world makes me more angry than outright lying to people. Well, I am also annoyed by endless reboots of superhero origin stories for Spider-Man and Superman. Please knock that off, studios. And when you do make another infernal superhero movie, please stop having invincible people punch each other. Why do they do this? Sigh. Full stop again…

So the political Left has adopted women’s rights as a pet issue, but unlike groups that arise, say, in the private sector, political groups don’t tend to achieve an objective and then move on to some other project. They need the issue to remain forever so they can continue to “gits paid” no matter what ill effect that may have on society. Have we not achieved equality for men and women yet? That is a trick question because I think we have now given women MORE rights than men while SAYING women have fewer rights, and this pendulum probably should swing back to the center, maybe starting twenty years ago. Why does this writer have such a bizarre and obviously stupid, uninformed and mean-spirited opinion? Well here are a few things that are informing me:

There is no right that I know of in America that men have that women do not have. They do however have an extra right in that they can choose to abort a fetus over the father’s objection and he cannot do anything to save it. Men do not have the right to do this even with the recent advent of the newfound ability for men to “have babies” which everyone knows they cannot really do unless you pretend a woman is a man, and then go from there.
Following that, some say men are restricting the rights of women to have abortions in some states, but the idea that it is just the men against the women on this is silly. If the women in those states wanted to change the laws, they could easily do it as they have the numbers. Many women simply want to restrict abortions too. Mostly for religious reasons but some just find it abhorrent.
Again, on that front, if I am setting up an evil patriarchy, as a man, I would make it easy as pie to get an abortion, and I would give men the power to abort babies against the will of the mother, or at least give the father the right of financial abortion. That is, opting out of parenting just like the woman can unilaterally do right now. His wages would not be affected were he to be given that same right. As it stands now, if the mother does not want the kid, she can kill it, if the man does not want the kid, the woman makes all his choices for him. What kind of patriarchy is this?
In this supposed patriarchy, prostitution is illegal (in most places that is, and heavily restricted where it is legal). Why would men make it illegal for them to simply lay down some cash for a side piece? Prostitution is really illegal because women want it that way. Not in my evil patriarchy it ain’t. In mine, prostitution is perfectly legal in any way anyone likes but there would be heavy penalties, like maybe the one that has the word “death” in the title, for anyone forcing anyone into prostitution. Trafficking might get you executed in my patriarchy.
In my patriarchy, women would NOT get automatic custody of children, like women do now.
In my patriarchy there would be just as much money spent on men’s health issues as there is on women’s issues like breast cancer.
In my patriarchy there would be as much focus on male suicide, which is much higher than women’s but gets pretty much no attention,
Men are much more likely to be killed in accidents or violent crimes as women are, so that would get some focus in my patriarchy.
Men who commit violent rape in my patriarchy might get executed. It’s only because of the feminine energy of the Left that we shy away from executing criminals that should be executed. Women tend to be easier on crime, and that trickles out the Left which adopts that feminine energy.
In my patriarchy we would explain to every person that men and women ALREADY DO get paid the same job where the same hours are worked. Men only seem to get paid more because they go into different careers that may require more schooling, or that are more dangerous or simply work more hours than women do.
If I set up an actual patriarchy there would be equal focus on getting both men and women to either get a college degree in something useful like nursing or engineering, or get some certification, and not keep hyper focusing on women who have already eclipsed men in those areas, yet we are still told women are falling behind the men.
In the weird patriarchy we have now, women are constantly told how beautiful and perfect they are and men are happily encouraged to lie to them and tell them they are gorgeous princesses, even if they are not. If you say Lizzo is not as attractive as Beyoncé, you may lose your job. This causes confusion with women who are expecting to marry a Tom Brady but he’s passing them over because he is “programmed” by the evil patriarchy to believe in some other standard of beauty. Males have always liked a lean healthy body, and I don’t care about that blip in time when some of the renaissance paintings featured plump babes. First off, none of them were Walmart Scooter-fat, and that was a time when we had bread and pasta and beer, so fatness became a little more common.
In this strange patriarchy we have now, women find about 80 to 90 percent of men “unattractive” according to dating app data whereas men rate HALF of women as attractive. This means that average-looking women are chasing after the top tier of good looking men (like the Tom Brady scenario) who are happy to have sex with all of them, but have no plans of “wifing” them. This is causing women to say that men are all dogs. Hey, try going out with a guy who is moderately attractive like you and you might be surprised how well that works out.
Women who come into money are much more likely to initiate a divorce and more likely to leave a marriage than a man is if he starts to make more money. In general about 80 percent of the time, the woman will initiate a divorce. Odd patriarchy that.
Virtually all of the therapy world, it is asserted by more than one recent article, has been feminized and has taken a very female-centric stance that basically has become a way to train the man to “behave as the woman wants him to behave because he is not a man but rather a hairy, misbehaving woman who needs to just act like a woman and everything will be fine.” Those quotes were mine, not from any article I read.

I have two daughters and love the fact that they are coming into a world that has given them a huge leg up, but this “patriarchy” we’ve got going on has created a bunch of men that young women do not want and it seems to be a combination of women being pandered to and being told that they are all beautiful princesses who deserve that man with all the sixes: six figures, six-pack abs, six feet tall. Ladies, those guys are selling their penis and it is a sellers’ market for them. You have to be Taylor Swift or the hottest supermodel to get them to marry you. Again, I want there to be a lot of men out there who are WORTHY of my daughters. I will actively teach my daughters that men and women ARE INDEED different and that we actually LIKE having different roles and that you should figure out what those roles are in a relationship and respect them and live them. I will tell them that if they have expectations that a man needs to meet for them, then there will likely be an equal and opposite set of expectations that they should be meeting for the man in their lives (they are too young now but both seem to be like most women who are attracted to males).

On many many episodes of Just Pearly Things video podcast (and a new one called Pearl Daily), there will be a room full of women and men together, the women all generally rate their attractiveness much higher than the men rate them, and then the men are chastised for being wrong. Sometimes the men say what they are looking for in a women, and one of those things is invariably a level of “purity” as in a virgin (which is pretty much unheard of in the west) or at least a very low “body count” and then the women will generally spend the next hour telling the men why they should not want that.

On that count I tend to have a little bit of jealousy and contempt for women who think they are pulling off some sort of skillful feat by saying yes to a lot of guys who want to have sex with them. A woman can rack up a body count of 20 in one day if she wants to. You know how hard that is for a guy who is not Tom Brady? I can tell you it is pretty hard. Might take a lifetime of normal relationships and dating and having girlfriends and such. So, ladies, your high body count is seen as gluttony or perhaps rubbing it in our faces. I will happily have sex with a girl who has been ridden by all my friends but I am not going to be the poor sap who buys her a ring and a white dress and marries her. You wanna pay the “new car” price for that Tesla that everybody drove and tore up in high speed chase or are you gonna want a discount on that thing? You pay full price for it you are just a door mat. If you get a deal that you like, go for it.

And women still do want to get married, despite pretending to agree with those feminists who tell them the “patriarchy” wants them to get married and they should resist it, those feminists who pretend there is “still so much work to do,“ have damaged the very people they aimed to help. But they don’t care because the money keeps coming in to their various organizations.

The patriarchy “wants” women married? Look, in my evil patriarchy, we would encourage women to have lots of anonymous sex with all men, not just that top tier of guys they think they will marry, and abortions would be available at any 7–11.

One final thought. These laws that take the “fun” out of life for men were actually passed by men before women had any power. It’s as if they knew society would be better if these things were discouraged and I wonder…have women followed suit with that notion? Would women make a law that bettered society but made things less fun for them or harder on them specifically? If you come up with something shoot me a comment and let me mull it over.